Trust & Methodology
SHIOS puts evidence before AI: 43,564 real sources underpin 649 forecasts, with 386 resolved and a 46% confirmation rate. SHIOS publishes every forecast before outcomes are known, then scores it against what actually happened — including misses.
Don't trust the AI. Inspect the evidence. This page exists because a skeptical visitor deserves a real answer, not a reassurance.
43,564
real sources
649
all-time
386
have a verdict
46%
of resolved forecasts
How SHIOS actually works
AI-assisted research
AI helps SHIOS collect, organize, compare, and summarize information across job postings, repositories, and other documents. It does not grade its own forecasts — every forecast is scored by comparing a stored baseline against what was actually observed later, using fixed arithmetic, not a second AI opinion. AI may help explain a result in plain English after the fact; it never decides the result.
Source hierarchy
Primary evidence — the actual job postings, repositories, and documents SHIOS collects directly. This is what nearly everything on this site is currently built from.
Independent research — third-party firms like Lightcast, Gartner, or the Stanford AI Index have no live data feed here and are referenced only as a point of comparison, never as a claim that they validated anything on this site. Two exceptions have a real, free public feed: Revelio Labs' RPLS dataset (monthly labor-market statistics) and CB Insights' free newsletter. Both are collected automatically and shown under "External Benchmarks" on the Evidence page — always as corroboration alongside our own numbers, never blended into any trend or forecast calculation.
Secondary sources — journalism, industry commentary. Used sparingly, always labeled.
Synthetic/demo data — clearly labeled wherever it appears, and never mixed silently with real evidence.
Frameworks that inform our approach
None of these organizations certify, validate, or endorse SHIOS. Where we say a framework "informs" our approach, that's the only claim being made.
Signal classification
Reports and practical guides label how much real evidence stands behind a pattern, so a single honest observation is never dressed up as a market trend.
Corrections & updates
Reports and guides carry a simple lifecycle status, always visible next to the content itself:
If a published report turns out to need a factual correction, we say so directly on that report rather than silently editing it — never a quiet rewrite.